Posted at 3:23 AM (CST) by & filed under Jim's Mailbox.

Dear Jim,

Here is another example of wafting anti-US dollar currency smoke.

Click here to view article…

This article lacks two big phrases:

1. "Possible" Future Gold backed currencies (Ruble or Yuan).
2. Trading in baskets of non US dollar currencies for trade settlement.

Now, is there a JSMinset reader who can parse Russian news releases? I know we have a few good Chinese interpreters. I think the Russians like to throw a lot of jabs when squaring off and they like to control the ring.

Ciga Ken



I had a chance to travel cross country this past week and finally got a chance to begin reading Adam Fergusson’s book "When Money Dies: The nightmare of the Weimar collapse." While I have not completely finished it yet, I can say that much of what I have already read seems to be no different than opening up the newspaper on any given day here in November of 2008… including the corrupt cronyism, incompetence and political turmoil.

If anyone is calling you with questions about whether or not owning gold, silver or quality mining stocks is the right thing to do, please have them get a copy of this book. It is out of circulation but they can get a copy from one of Amazon’s used book dealers.


Posted at 3:04 AM (CST) by & filed under Uncategorized.

Dear Friends,

I invite you to read the following news article from The Chinese often make official statements through a non-governmental expert. As the article suggests, when you become the world’s largest debtor nation, you cannot push others around to cure your debt problem. I have taken the liberty of highlighting sections of special interest.

When the exogenous event of dollar repatriation, the dollar short squeeze and the realigning of carry positions is over (very soon), the dollar will drop like a stone.

Jim Sinclair

Before Saving the US
November 11,2008
by CSC staff

The nature of the current global financial crisis is the biggest debt crisis in America’s history. The issuer of the world’s reserve currency, the US has been borrowing for quite a long time without any limit. America’s trade, international payment and fiscal deficits have existed for over 40 years (a fiscal dividend once occurred during Clinton’s administration but deficit soon returned). Statistics show that America’s internal and external debt exceeds $60 trillion, over 400% of the country’s annual GDP of a bit over $14 trillion. Of that total, family debt (including mortgages), financial and non-financial firms’ debt, and municipal and national debt come to about $15 trillion, $17 trillion, $22 trillion, $3.5 trillion, and $11 trillion, respectively, though it is hard to tell how these debts have been split up among foreign governments, financial firms, companies, and individuals.

To relieve the crisis, the US must repay its debts, and to do that it needs to live a more frugal life instead of asking others to continue lending it the money to maintain its over-consumption.

The first thing the government needs to do is reduce spending and the deficit. Correspondingly, the US needs to cut military disbursement, stop its global expansion and the robbing of oil resources from other countries. Companies should also become thrifty and avoid highly leveraged operation. Families and individuals should stop anticipating their income to buy houses and travel globally. Instead, they should warmly welcome foreigners to travel to and spend money in the US.

China Should Raise Conditions

But if the US must ask China to buy some portion of its national debt, what kind of conditions and principles should China we raise?

The principle should be the same as the basic principle upheld by the US and IMF when "saving" other countries in crisis: cut fiscal disbursement and both the government and the people should save money. Besides that, there are six points: first, the US should cancel the limits on high-tech exports to China, and allow China to acquire advanced technology and high-tech companies from the US; secondly, the US needs to open its financial system to Chinese financial institutions, allowing all Chinese financial firms to open branches and develop business in the US; third, the US should not prevent Europe from canceling the ban against selling weapons to China; fourth, the US should stop selling military weapons to Taiwan; fifth, the US should loosen its limits on numbers of Chinese tourists and allow them to travel freely to the US; and sixth, the US should never restrain China’s exports to the US and force RMB appreciation in the name of domestic protectionism and employment pressure.

If the US should refuse to agree to the six principals, that only means it doesn’t really need China to save its market and buy its national debt. Then China’s choice is quite simple: rationally adjust the structure of its foreign exchange reserve assets and avoid the risk of the US national debt according to market rules.

What is worth special attention is that the prerequisite for China’s purchase of US national debt is that China has enough foreign currency to meet the exchange demand when hot money is flowing out in large scale. Otherwise China will have to sell US debt to relieve its lack of foreign exchange currency, which will lead to sharp depreciation of China’s dollar assets. What is even worse, China may immediately suffer a financial crisis led by the lack of foreign currency.

So if the US wants China to help save its market, the US government and the IMF must admit China’s right to manage its foreign exchange independently. Once large scale hot money outflows occurs, China has the right to take effective measures to restrain the speed and amount of hot money outflow, and the US and IMF can’t blame China for it. This is the most important prerequisite, even more important than the six principles mentioned above. If the US can’t agree to it, China may trap itself when saving the US. When exchange crisis happens in China, who can promise the US and the IMF won’t hit China when it’s down?

(The author is a professor at Central China University of Science and Technology. The piece is translated from his article on China Business News)

Link to full article…

Posted at 3:29 PM (CST) by & filed under In The News.

Dear Friends,

I ask that you spend at least half of your time on why you are right in gold rather than spending all of your time scouring the planet to find ways and means of moving yourselves closer to your financial demise.

The phone calls I receive are mostly asking the same questions over and over again. Please stop that negativity. First read JSMineset as many times all of your questions have already been answered.

A person who spends all their time looking for why they are wrong, even if they are right, will find a way not to benefit. That is guaranteed.

Respectfully yours,


Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

Today’s new news (seriously):

TARP = Trouble Asset Relief Program (now closed).
QE = Quantitative Easing. (now opened).
CRAP = Consumer Relief Asset Program.
The lower Yen was the product of QE in the early 2000s.
A lower dollar will be a product of QE and CRAP.
Finally it will be remembered as CRAPpy QE.

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary
Here Paulson tells those with ears that the shift now is a major acceleration of monetary stimulus because Quantitative Easing is infinitely more powerful that buying all that junk from the near and dear globally. Globally is because there is a back door.

The Guardian gives you a totally accurate definition of Quantitative Easing. This time Helicopter Ben takes off to drop trillions globally.

Gold will trade at $1000, $1250, and $1650.

Paulson Shifts Bailout Focus to Borrowers and Non-Banks

Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. said that the $700 billion financial bailout program would not be used to buy troubled mortgage-backed assets, as originally intended.

Instead, capital would be provided directly to nonbank companies as well as banks and financial institutions, and that more would be done to prevent home foreclosures.


Quantitative easing
Tuesday October 14 2008 12.10 BST

Quantitative easing is what non-economists call ‘turning on the printing press’.

In extreme circumstances, governments flood the financial system with money, easing pressure on banks by giving them extra capital.

Ben Bernanke, the chairman of the Fed, won the nickname ‘helicopter Ben’ when he floated just such an idea earlier this decade. US economist Milton Friedman had originally said it would be theoretically possible for governments to drop large amounts of cash out of helicopters for the public to pick up and spend.



Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

You expected anything different?

Lobbyists Swarm the Treasury for Piece of Bailout Pie
November 12, 2008

WASHINGTON — When the government said it would spend $700 billion to rescue the nation’s financial industry, it seemed to be an ocean of money. But after one of the biggest lobbying free-for-alls in memory, it suddenly looks like a dwindling pool.

Many new supplicants are lining up for an infusion of capital as billions of dollars are channeled to other beneficiaries like the American International Group, and possibly soon American Express.

Of the initial $350 billion that Congress freed up, out of the $700 billion in bailout money contained in the law that passed last month, the Treasury Department has committed all but $60 billion. The shrinking pie — and the growing uncertainty over who qualifies — has thrown Washington’s legal and lobbying establishment into a mad scramble.

The Treasury Department is under siege by an army of hired guns for banks, savings and loan associations and insurers — as well as for improbable candidates like a Hispanic business group representing plumbing and home-heating specialists. That last group wants the Treasury to hire its members as contractors to take care of houses that the government may end up owning through buying distressed mortgages.



Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

The dollar will not protect your pension – gold will.

U.S. Companies Ask Congress to Suspend Rule on Pension Payments

By Brian Faler

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) — Almost 300 companies are asking Congress, as part of any economic stimulus legislation, to suspend a requirement that they pay more into their pension funds, saying it may force them to cut jobs.

Pfizer Inc., Boeing Co., Chrysler LLC, Verizon Communications Inc., Kraft Foods Inc. and Cigna Corp. are among the companies that signed a letter to lawmakers saying the economic slowdown has slashed the value of their pension assets, forcing them to make potentially “huge” contributions to the pension plans to meet requirements imposed by Congress in 2006.

“When companies desperately need cash to keep their businesses afloat, the new funding rules will require huge, countercyclical contributions to their pension plans,” said the letter, to be sent today. “Consequently many companies will divert cash needed for current job retention, job creation and needed business investments.”

Congressional Democrats are urging President George W. Bush to back an economic stimulus package that would provide federal aid to state governments while boosting spending on unemployment assistance, food stamps and infrastructure projects. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said yesterday she also wants to provide aid to troubled U.S. automakers.


Posted at 3:24 PM (CST) by & filed under Jim's Mailbox.

Dear CIGAs,

The following is courtesy of CIGA Marc D




The author is at least one of the "young geeks" you so often refer to who figured out himself that he was a fraud!

“Sooner rather than later, there would come a Great Reckoning when Wall Street would wake up and hundreds if not thousands of young people like me, who had no business making huge bets with other people’s money, would be expelled from finance.”



Posted at 1:36 PM (CST) by & filed under General Editorial.

Dear CIGAs,

Quantitive Easing – the direction the Fed is taking, saying they no longer are interested in buying toxic OTC derivatives with little or no value.

This change may well be a result of Bloomberg’s suit to force the Fed to reveal what these assets are on their balance sheet. This forced change to Quantitive Easing is the strongest tool for blasting trillions into economies.

If you know anything about, monetary science, gold is down on one of the greatest positive gold factors.

In the Japanese experience banks and other institutions did not renew lending significant enough for any positive effect. Many simply took the funds to rebuild their shattered balance sheets.

Quantitive Easing does not provide a basis for dollar strength, no matter what the algorithms say.

Not only was it an internal failure but it took the Yen down about 20%.

The talking heads are now saying that the dollar is the measure of how bad the economy will become. That is foolish in today’s situation

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

As the balance sheet of the Fed turns toxic on the asset side, the US dollar as the common share of this balance sheet must go down

The Federal Reserve’s balance sheet
October 25, 2008

On Thursday, the Federal Reserve issued its weekly H.4.1 report, which provides details of the Fed’s balance sheet. Once upon a time, this was one of the least interesting of the government’s many releases of data. These days, it’s become one of the most exciting.

The essence of the Fed’s balance sheet used to be quite simple. The Fed’s primary operations would consist of either buying outstanding Treasury securities or issuing loans to banks through its discount window. It paid for these transactions by creating credits in accounts that banks hold with the Federal Reserve, known as reserve deposits. Banks can turn those reserves into green cash any time they desire, so the process is sometimes loosely summarized as saying that the Fed pays for the Treasury bills it buys or loans it extends by "printing money". Before the excitement began, the Fed’s assets consisted primarily of the Treasury securities it had acquired over time (about $800 billion as of August 2007) plus its discount loans (an insignificant number at that time). Its liabilities consisted primarily of cash held by the public (about $800 billion a year ago) plus the reserve deposits held by banks (which again used to be a very small number).


The Carry Trade
The Return of the Geeks
Jun 07, 2006

I have been thinking about the nightmare carry trade scenario. In other words, what is the worst possible situation for carry trade players?

For those unfamiliar with the term ‘carry trade,’ I will use the definition found on

“Carry trade – The speculation strategy that borrows an asset at one interest rate, sells the asset, then invests those funds into a different asset that generates a higher interest rate yield. Profit is acquired by the difference between the cost of the borrowed asset and the yield on the purchased asset.”

The nightmare carry trade scenario: the six conditions

I view the nightmare scenario something like the following:

1. End of quantitative easing (QE) in Japan
2. End of ZIRP in Japan (Rising interest rates)
3. Rising interest rates in Europe
4. Falling interest rates in the U.S.
5. Tightening credit in the U.S.
6. A rising yen vs. the U.S. dollar

The nightmare carry trade scenario: quantitative easing has ended

Quantitative easing has already ended in Japan. Quantitative easing simply means excessive printing of money by the Bank of Japan in order to defeat the deflation that has been raging for about 18 years.

I believe that ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) and QE (quantitative easing) prolonged Japan’s deflation, but for now, that is irrelevant. The key point is that both are about to come to an end. Proof of the


Jim Sinclair’s Commentary
Quantitive Easing at an unprecedented rate (certainly to take place) combined with 1% interest rates in the US is a road to Weimar. The dollar and the Fed are at the helm.

If you know anything about monetary science, gold is down on the greatest positive factor for gold.

Posted at 10:12 PM (CST) by & filed under Uncategorized.

Dear Friends,

Welcome to the make believe world of what is left of the young lions. These people are clearly the top of the mega-speculative feeding chain and are now trying to eat each other.

Gold is the inverse of the dollar. Dollar strength is a product of short-term demand and short covering. This short covering emanates from enormous unstable risk carry trades and OTC derivatives written thereupon being buffeted by changing interest and cross rates, even if the changes are only window dressing.

What that means is large supply and demand emanating from our dear friends who are the same people who have basically killed the international financial systems. They are back again causing the US dollar to run contrary to the interests of fighting deflation as you will read below.

This dollar strength is not fundamental nor will it last one day longer than it takes the young lions to close or square their positions.

Welcome to the make believe world of what is left of the young lions. They are now trying to eat each other.

Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

To understand what is happening that so far has confused if not demoralized you, it is time to read the following. The key points are underlined.

Remarks by Governor Ben S. Bernanke
Before the National Economists Club, Washington, D.C.
November 21, 2002

Deflation: Making Sure "It" Doesn’t Happen Here
“Although a policy of intervening to affect the exchange value of the dollar is nowhere on the horizon today, it’s worth noting that there have been times when exchange rate policy has been an effective weapon against deflation. A striking example from U.S. history is Franklin Roosevelt’s 40 percent devaluation of the dollar against gold in 1933-34, enforced by a program of gold purchases and domestic money creation. The devaluation and the rapid increase in money supply it permitted ended the U.S. deflation remarkably quickly.”

Of course, the U.S. government is not going to print money and distribute it willy-nilly (although as we will see later, there are practical policies that approximate this behavior). Normally, money is injected into the economy through asset purchases by the Federal Reserve. To stimulate aggregate spending when short-term interest rates have reached zero, the Fed must expand the scale of its asset purchases or, possibly, expand the menu of assets that it buys. Alternatively, the Fed could find other ways of injecting money into the system–for example, by making low-interest-rate loans to banks or cooperating with the fiscal authorities. Each method of adding money to the economy has advantages and drawbacks, both technical and economic. One important concern in practice is that calibrating the economic effects of nonstandard means of injecting money may be difficult, given our relative lack of experience with such policies. Thus, as I have stressed already, prevention of deflation remains preferable to having to cure it. If we do fall into deflation, however, we can take comfort that the logic of the printing press example must assert itself, and sufficient injections of money will ultimately always reverse a deflation.

I need to tread carefully here. Because the economy is a complex and interconnected system, Fed purchases of the liabilities of foreign governments have the potential to affect a number of financial markets, including the market for foreign exchange. In the United States, the Department of the Treasury, not the Federal Reserve, is the lead agency for making international economic policy, including policy toward the dollar; and the Secretary of the Treasury has expressed the view that the determination of the value of the U.S. dollar should be left to free market forces. Moreover, since the United States is a large, relatively closed economy, manipulating the exchange value of the dollar would not be a particularly desirable way to fight domestic deflation, particularly given the range of other options available. Thus, I want to be absolutely clear that I am today neither forecasting nor recommending any attempt by U.S. policymakers to target the international value of the dollar.

Although a policy of intervening to affect the exchange value of the dollar is nowhere on the horizon today, it’s worth noting that there have been times when exchange rate policy has been an effective weapon against deflation. A striking example from U.S. history is Franklin Roosevelt’s 40 percent devaluation of the dollar against gold in 1933-34, enforced by a program of gold purchases and domestic money creation. The devaluation and the rapid increase in money supply it permitted ended the U.S. deflation remarkably quickly. Indeed, consumer price inflation in the United States, year on year, went from -10.3 percent in 1932 to -5.1 percent in 1933 to 3.4 percent in 1934.17 The economy grew strongly, and by the way, 1934 was one of the best years of the century for the stock market. If nothing else, the episode illustrates that monetary actions can have powerful effects on the economy, even when the nominal interest rate is at or near zero, as was the case at the time of Roosevelt’s devaluation.


Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

Judging from historical review, employing Quantitative Easing as a tool to fight deflation over a significant period of time will serve to depress the value of the currency in the long term.

Bernanke May Seek New Tactics as Fed Rate Nears 1%
By CB Online Staff
(Excerpts from article)

`Quantitative Easing’

The Bank of Japan, struggling against deflation, slow growth and consumers’ reluctance to spend, brought its policy rate close to zero before turning in 2001 to a so-called quantitative easing strategy of increasing money in accounts held for commercial banks. The policy lasted for five years, before the central bank began to draw down reserves and raised its benchmark rate to 0.5 percent, where it has been since February 2007.

The Fed has flooded the economy with so much cash that excess reserve balances at banks, or cash surpluses beyond what banks are required to hold against deposits, soared to $136 billion for the two-week period ending Oct. 8 compared with an average of $1.4 billion in the same month last year.

“The Federal Reserve has already entered a regime of quantitative easing,” said Brian Sack, vice president at Macroeconomic Advisers LLC who also worked with Bernanke as an economist in the Monetary Affairs Division.

As their liquidity programs dump excess funds into the banking system, it’s become more difficult for the Fed to keep the rate at which banks lend overnight to each other in line with policy makers’ 1.5 percent target



Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

As violent moves take place both in rates (Lie-bor) and de-leveraged assets, currency value in today’s world reflects the short term currency demand and supply having nothing whatsoever to do with underlying fundamentals.

Dollar fundamentals are dire. Combine the facts that the largest denomination of reserves held by central banks previously having indicated a desire to diversify, and that dollar based institutions hold more OTC toxic derivatives than others, the dollar long term direction is DOWN.

What is taking place now is the crazy speculators in complex trades creating un-real prices in terms of trend, screwing up the world one more time.

Currency Carry Trade

What does it mean?
A strategy in which an investor sells a certain currency with a relatively low interest rate and uses the funds to purchase a different currency yielding a higher interest rate. A trader using this strategy attempts to capture the difference between the rates, which can often be substantial, depending on the amount of leverage the investor chooses to use.

Investopedia Says…
Here’s an example of a "yen carry trade": a trader borrows 1,000 yen from a Japanese bank, converts the funds into U.S. dollars and buys a bond for the equivalent amount. Let’s assume that the bond pays 4.5% and the Japanese interest rate is set at 0%. The trader stands to make a profit of 4.5% (4.5% – 0%), as long as the exchange rate between the countries does not change. Many professional traders use this trade because the gains can become very large when leverage is taken into consideration. If the trader in our example uses a common leverage factor of 10:1, then she can stand to make a profit of 45%.

The big risk in a carry trade is the uncertainty of exchange rates. Using the example above, if the U.S. dollar was to fall in value relative to the Japanese yen, then the trader would run the risk of losing money. Also, these transactions are generally done with a lot of leverage, so a small movement in exchange rates can result in huge losses unless hedged appropriately.


Jim Sinclair’s Commentary

The supposed upcoming new Bretton Woods Agreement is more concerned with:

1. Unregulated hedge funds now screwing up the exchange markets making Bernanke’s fight against deflation ineffectual.
2. The implementation of Quantitative Monetary Easing.
3. The implementation of Fiscal Stimulus on a Global basis.

There is no chance of any new monetary order when the old one is presently acting like a Category 4 twister.

Yen Near Highest This Week as Stock Decline Crimps Carry Trades
By Ron Harui and Stanley White
(Excerpt from article)

Leaders of the Group of 20 industrial and emerging nations, due to gather Nov. 14-15 in Washington, will consider steps ranging from raising bank-capital standards to regulating hedge funds to address the financial crisis. Member nations’ finance ministers called for interest-rate cuts and increased government spending after meeting this week in Sao Paulo.



Since gold is the inverse of the US dollar and the dollar strength is purely from enormous money flows seeking to readjust their positions, it is quite short term. It could end as early as one minute from now.

When it does end, the dollar dives and gold roars.

Gold will trade at $1200 and at $1650.


Posted at 10:03 PM (CST) by & filed under Guild Investment.

Dear CIGAs,


The stock market discounts future economic events.  Right now it is discounting economic decline that will not take place for months.  Financial stocks have been declining for over 16months, and the U.S. market as a whole for 13months. Yet, if you believe the Government’s economic statistics, the economy was growing through June.

Many stocks could fall further over the next several months or years in our opinion.  Financial stocks will be among them.  However, some stocks are so cheap that they deserve to be bought, even though we expect further global macro economic problems.  In such an environment, many assets become priced too cheaply, and the wise who have husbanded their liquidity, will have the capital to buy greatly undervalued assets, like the clerk in the following story.

During the great depression of the 1930s, there was a humble clerk on the New York Stock Exchange, who had assiduously saved his money.  This man saw Singer Sewing Machine, one of the great tech stocks of the day, fall to $1 per share.  He put  his savings in the stock.  In the following years, the stock rose many fold, and he became a very rich man. 

This story combines two important attributes of the successful investor.  First, he was a saver and thus had capital when the time was right to buy.  Second, he knew value and bought when others could only think of selling.

Even if we are in for another Great Depression (and we don’t currently think that we are), in our opinion there will be many stock market rallies, and some of them will be big.

Even in the Great Depression, in some years stocks were down substantially and in others they were up..  As we have pointed out before, the Great Depression had no less than 3 huge rallies, rallying 50%, 130%, and 90%.  It also had many 10-15% rallies.


The current economic slowdown is the result of unwise speculation in many things, but especially real estate.  The problem was created  by: 15 continuous years of unwise political and legislative decisions, unwise personal behavior of many individuals, unwise salesmanship from the real estate industry and Wall Street in the U.S. and from many banking institutions and investors in other countries, and a lack of discipline and due diligence on the part of many of the participants.


The bad actors in the real estate profession will gradually be purged, and many may see the inside of a jail cell.  The unwise real estate purchasers are experiencing foreclosure.  Unfortunately, the second class intellects in Congress, who created and fostered much of the problem, and some of the Wall Street problem creators are still in charge of the Ship of State.  This is not a pretty picture. Let us hope that President-Elect Obama has the wisdom to avoid elevating any destructive political figures and  Wall Street problem creators to positions of power.

I believe that it was former Vice President Hubert Humphrey who once said, "To err is human. To blame it on someone else is politics."  Clearly, we have seen a masterful display of this skill in the current national economic debate.

Negativity and pessimism abound in the media and in public conversation about the markets.  While all of the negativity has been festering, to us it looks like Chinese, Brazilian, Indian, and other stock markets, along with some currencies, some growth stocks, oil stocks, gold stocks, and food stocks halted their declines and some have actually began to appreciate from their lows.

We expect we will get periods of weakness, and possibly re-test the lows. In our opinion, however, smart investors  may want to place some low priced bids for stocks that get thrown away. This has been the  standard behavior of many successful investors for centuries.

Untitled_Page_1 Untitled_Page_2 Untitled_Page_3