Jim Sinclair’s Commentary
If the chart of bitcoin can be it’s only claim to pricing, then bitcoin has the potential of a total retraction to the old days. Chart from Zero Hedge.
Bill Holter’s Commentary
Really? I would be pretty pissed if the primary candidate I supported was “rigged against”! It seems these lawyers are saying the 1st Amendment is only pertinent if your use of it agrees with them. This train of thought is also trendy in our “higher” institutions of learning…
Lawyers For The DNC Argue That Primary Rigging Is Protected By The First Amendment
February 24, 2018
The ongoing litigation of the DNC Fraud Lawsuit and the appeal regarding its dismissal took a stunning turn yesterday. The defendants in the case, including the DNC and former DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, filed a response brief that left many observers of the case at a loss for words.
The document, provided by the law offices of the Attorneys for the Plaintiffs in the case, Jared and Elizabeth Beck, and appears to argue that if the Democratic Party did cheat Sanders in the 2016 Presidential primary race, then that action was protected under the first amendment. Twitter users were quick to respond to the brief, expressing outrage and disgust at the claims made by representatives of the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
The Defense counsel also argued that because of Jared Beck’s outspoken twitter posts, the plaintiffs were using the litigation process for political purposes: “For example, Plaintiffs’ counsel Jared Beck repeatedly refers to the DNC as “shi*bags” on Twitter and uses other degrading language in reference to Defendants.” Fascinatingly, no mention is made regarding the importance of First Amendment at this point in the document.